4.5 Review

Routes for Drug Translocation Across the Blood-Brain Barrier: Exploiting Peptides as Delivery Vectors

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
卷 106, 期 9, 页码 2326-2334

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.xphs.2017.04.080

关键词

blood-brain barrier; drug delivery systems; drug transport; endothelial; membrane translocation; peptide delivery; peptides; permeation enhancers; transporters

资金

  1. Lundbeck Foundation via the Lundbeck Foundation Research Network on Brain Barriers and Drug Delivery (RIBBDD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A number of potent drugs for the treatment of brain diseases are available. However, in order for them to reach their target site of action, they must pass the blood-brain barrier (BBB). The capillary endothelium comprises the major barrier of the BBB and allows only passive permeation of some small lipophilic molecules. Brain delivery of the larger biopharmaceuticals, which today includes an increasing number of novel drug entities, is therefore restricted, both due to their molecular size and their hydrophilic nature. Thus, the development of novel drug entities intended for the treatment of brain diseases such as neurodegenerative diseases or brain cancers require a delivery strategy for overcoming the BBB before reaching its final target within the brain. Peptide-based delivery vector is an emerging tool as shuttles for drug delivery across the BBB and one may explore receptor-mediated transcytosis, adsorptive-mediated transcytosis, and the paracellular route. The latter, however, being controversial due to the risk of co-delivery of blood-borne potential harmful substances. On the other hand, a number of studies report on drug delivery across the BBB exploiting receptor-mediated transcytosis and adsorptive-mediated transcytosis, indicating that peptides and peptide vectors may be of use in a central nervous system delivery context. (C) 2017 American Pharmacists Association (R). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据