4.5 Article

Silica nanofluids in polyacrylamide with and without surfactant: Viscosity, surface tension, and interfacial tension with liquid paraffin

期刊

JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
卷 152, 期 -, 页码 575-585

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2017.01.039

关键词

Interfacial tension; Nanofluid; Nanoparticle; Polymer; Surface tension; Surfactant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The reduction in interfacial tension (IFT) of paraffin crude oil is of key importance, particularly for oilfield applications such as enhanced oil recovery (EOR). Nanoparticle laden suspension such as nanofluid is gaining widespread interest and their use to achieve moderate IFT reduction in paraffin crude oil. In this work, stable nanofluids of an oilfield polymer (polyacrylamide, PAM) with and without surfactant (sodium dodecyl sulfate, SDS) have been formulated and examined for IFT reduction of paraffin oils such as n-decane, n-hexane, n-pentane, and n-heptane. Nanofluids were also investigated for various studies such as dispersion stability, viscosity, rate of sedimentation (ROS), and DLS based measurements (size and zeta-potential). Other studies involving investigations on surface tension (SFT), IFT reduction, effect of SDS and varying SiO2 concentration on IFT reduction, and their efficacy for IFT reduction under high temperature environment have also been reported. The performance of nanofluids for IFT reduction has been compared with IFT results of conventional polymer (P) and surfactant-polymer (SP) methods, which are typically used for chemical-EOR practices. As compared to P and SP methods, IFT value of nanoparticle-polymer (NP) and nanoparticle-surfactant-polymer (NSP) fluids were found to be significantly lower suitable for enhanced oil recovery. In addition, NSP nanofluids provided superior reduction in IFT values mainly due to the presence of SDS. Thus, we conclude that SiO2 nanofluid, as compared to P/SP EOR methods, can be a potential alternative to reduce the IFT of paraffin crude oil.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据