4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Diagnostic utility of core needle biopsy versus open wedge biopsy for pediatric intraabdominal solid tumors: Results of a prospective clinical study

期刊

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY
卷 52, 期 12, 页码 2042-2046

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.08.032

关键词

Tumor biopsy; Core needle; Pediatric tumors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: The best method for diagnosing pediatric nonnephroblastoma solid intraabdominal tumors is unknown. We hypothesized that core needle biopsy (CNB) is noninferior to open wedge biopsy (OWB) for pathologic diagnosis. Methods: We prospectively enrolled children aged 1 day to 17 years with radiographic evidence of nonnephroblastoma solid intraabdominal tumors scheduled for OWB from 5/2013 to 12/2015 at a single institution. Four 16-gauge CNBs were obtained, followed by OWB. Two pathologists independently reviewed all specimens to determine adequacy for diagnosis. Results: Fourteen patients enrolled, 57% male, with an average age of 4 years (range 7 days to 16 years). Both pathologists agreed OWB was completely sufficient for diagnosis in 13 patients (93%), compared to 4 patients for CNB (29%: Burkitt lymphoma, adrenocortical tumor, inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor, p = 0.001, delta = -0.64 +/- 0.27, 95% CI). In 6 patients (43%), CNB was incompletely diagnostic according to at least one pathologist (neuroblastoma, hepatoblastoma). In 4 patients (29%), both pathologists determined that CNB was nondiagnostic (ganglioneuroblastoma, teratoma, hepatoblastoma, and recurrent neuroblastoma). Conclusions: In a prospective clinical study, CNB is inferior to OWB for the pathologic diagnosis of pediatric nonnephroblastoma solid intraabdominal tumors. These data suggest that OWB should generally be performed in these patients. (c) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据