4.5 Article

Implementation and Impact of Patient Lay Navigator-Led Advance Care Planning Conversations

期刊

JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT
卷 53, 期 4, 页码 682-692

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.11.012

关键词

Advance care planning; lay navigation; lay navigator; end of life

资金

  1. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services [1C1CMS331023]
  2. Walter B. Frommeyer, Jr. Fellowship in Investigative Medicine
  3. Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context. Advance care planning (ACP) improves alignment between patient preferences for life-sustaining treatment and care received at end of life (EOL). Objectives. To evaluate implementation of lay navigator-led ACP. Methods. A convergent, parallel mixed-methods design was used to evaluate implementation of navigator-led ACP across 12 cancer centers. Data collection included 1) electronic navigation records, 2) navigator surveys (n = 45), 3) claims-based patient outcomes (n = 820), and 4) semistructured navigator interviews (n = 26). Outcomes of interest included 1) the number of ACP conversations completed, 2) navigator self-efficacy, 3) patient resource utilization, hospice use, and chemotherapy at EOL, and 4) navigator-perceived barriers and facilitators to ACP. Results. From June 1, 2014 to December 31, 2015, 50 navigators completed Respecting Choices (R) First Steps ACP Facilitator training. Navigators approached 18% of patients (1319/8704); 481 completed; 472 in process; 366 declined. Navigators were more likely to approach African American patients than Caucasian patients (20% vs. 14%, P < 0.001). Significant increases in ACP self-efficacy were observed after training. The mean score for feeling prepared to conduct ACP conversations increased from 5.6/10 to 7.5/10 (P < 0.001). In comparison with patients declining ACP participation (n = 171), decedents in their final 30 days of life who engaged in ACP (n = 437) had fewer hospitalizations (46% vs. 56%, P = 0.02). Key facilitators of successful implementation included physician buy-in, patient readiness, and prior ACP experience; barriers included space limitations, identifying the right'' time to start conversations, and personal discomfort discussing EOL. Conclusion. A navigator-led ACP program was feasible and may be associated with lower rates of resource utilization near EOL. (C) 2017 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据