4.3 Article

Study on Mechanism of Freeze-Thaw Cycles Induced Changes in Soil Strength Using Electrical Resistivity and X-Ray Computed Tomography

出版社

ASME
DOI: 10.1115/1.4035244

关键词

freeze-thaw cycles; shear strength; microstructure; electrical resistivity; computed tomography

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41572268, 41671061, 41501084]
  2. Development of High-Caliber Talents Project of Beijing Municipal Institutions [CITTCD20150101]
  3. Research Project of the State Key Laboratory of Frozen Soils Engineering [SKLDSE-ZT-28]
  4. Fund of the Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute [HHS-TSS-STS-1502]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, freeze-thaw cycles were conducted on samples of a fine grained soil from the Qinghai-Tibetan plateau which had been prepared with different dry unit weights. During freeze-thaw cycles, electrical resistivity was measured. The soil samples were also scanned by X-ray computed tomography (CT) before and after freeze-thaw cycles. Unconsolidated and drained (UD) triaxial compression test was performed to obtain the apparent friction angle and cohesion. Changes in the arrangement and connections between soil particles were analyzed so as to investigate the mechanisms of changes in the strength parameters. The electrical resistivity increased in all samples, regardless of the different original dry unit weights, which implies that in all cases the arrangement of soil particles became more irregular and attached area between soil particles was increased. These changes contributed to the increase of apparent friction angle. On the other hand, the CT scans indicated that, depending upon the original dry unit weight, freeze-thaw cycles induced strengthening or deterioration in particle connections, and thus apparent cohesion was increased or decreased. With three freeze-thaw cycles, changes in microstructure of soil samples led to increases or decrease in both the apparent friction angle and cohesion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据