4.3 Article

A Pilot Study of Fluorescent Imaging of Colorectal Tumors Using γ-Glutamyl-Transpeptidase-Activatable Fluorescent Probe

期刊

DIGESTION
卷 91, 期 1, 页码 70-76

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000369367

关键词

Activatable fluorescent probe; Colorectal tumor; Fluorescent imaging; gamma-Glutamyl hydroxymethyl rhodamine green; gamma-Glutamyl-transpeptidase

资金

  1. National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund [23-B-17]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25113707] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Backgrounds/Aim: Colorectal laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) are sometimes difficult to visualize even with imageenhanced endoscopy. gamma-Glutamyl-transpeptidase (GGT) is a cell surface-associated enzyme that is overexpressed in various types of human cancers. Furthermore, GGT expression is higher in colorectal cancer cells than in normal colorectal mucosa. gamma-Glutamyl hydroxymethyl rhodamine green (gGlu-HMRG), an activatable fluorescent probe, is nonfluorescent under a neutral pH and normal cellular environment; however, it turns highly fluorescent upon reaction with GGT. We evaluated ex vivo fluorescent imaging of colorectal LSTs using this GGT-activatable fluorescent probe. Methods: Between March 2013 and March 2014, 30 endoscopically resected colorectal LSTs were prospectively included in this study. Each was analyzed by first taking a baseline image before spraying, then spraying with gGluHMRG onto the freshly resected specimen, and finally taking fluorescent images 15 min after spraying with a dedicated imaging machine. Results: Of the LSTs, 67% rapidly showed positive fluorescent activity. These activities were shown in adenoma (54%) and carcinoma in adenoma (76%), and in LST-granular type (80%) and LST-nongranular type (40%). Conclusion: Topically spraying gGlu-HMRG enabled rapid and selective fluorescent imaging of colorectal tumors owing to the upregulated GGT activity in cancer cells. (C) 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据