4.7 Article

High temperature annealing for structural optimization of silica aerogels in solar thermal applications

期刊

JOURNAL OF NON-CRYSTALLINE SOLIDS
卷 462, 期 -, 页码 72-77

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2017.02.009

关键词

Transparent silica aerogel; Solar-thermal energy conversion; Concentrated solar power

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [DMR-1419807]
  2. DANSE project under NSF award [DMR-052054]
  3. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program [1122374]
  4. ARPA-E FOCUS program [DE-AR0000471]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Optically transparent, thermally insulating monolithic silica aerogel, with its high solar transmittance and low thermal conductivity, is well-suited for solar thermal applications, particularly concentrated solar power systems. The properties of silica aerogel are directly determined by the structure of the highly porous, interconnected silica network. By using high temperature annealing to control this structure post-synthesis, we were able to optimize the material to increase solar transmittance with minimal effect on the effective thermal conductivity using an easy and scalable method. Samples made from two silica aerogel chemistries and two annealing temperatures (400 degrees C and 600 degrees C) were investigated as a function of annealing time. The annealed samples showed a maximum increase in solar spectral transmittance of over 3% while the effective thermal conductivity (including radiative and conductive contributions) was shown to increase by as much as 40%, indicating a need to optimize the annealing time for maximum performance. The properties of the characterized aerogels were used to demonstrate aerogel annealing optimization using a concentrated solar power receiver model operating at 400 degrees C. The model predicted a maximum receiver efficiency gain of 1% by annealing for 24 h at 400 degrees C, representing a significant gain in overall system efficiency. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据