4.7 Article

Aggregation behaviors of mixed systems for imidazole based ionic liquid surfactant and Triton X-100

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR LIQUIDS
卷 232, 期 -, 页码 55-61

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2017.02.044

关键词

Electrical conductivity; FT-IR; H-1 NMR; Ionic liquid; Surface tension; Triton X-100

资金

  1. Jiangsu Province College Students' Innovative Training Project [201610324044x]
  2. Excellent Specialties Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, Project [PPZY2015B113]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The adsorption and aggregation of mixed systems for ionic liquid (ILs) surfactants (1-decyl-3-methylimidazolium bromide, C(10)mimBr, 1-dodecyl-3-methylimidazolium bromide, C(12)mimBr, 1-hexadecyl-3-methylimidazolium bromide, C(16)mimBr) and non-ionic surfactant Triton X-100 in aqueous media have been investigated by surface tension measurements, electrical conductivity, H-1 NMR and FTIR technologies. Surface properties have been determined such as critical micelle concentration (CMC), surface saturation adsorption (Gamma(max)), minimum surface area per surfactant molecule (A(min)), surface tension at the CMC (gamma(CMC)), adsorption efficiency (pC(20)), and surface pressure at the CMC (Pi(CMC)) as well as thermodynamic parameters of micellization. The surface tension measurements revealed that the addition of Triton X-100 into Rs can decrease CMC of ILs, suggesting that it is beneficial to the mixed micelle formation. Consistent with the results of surface tension, electrical conductivity measurement demonstrate a small degree of counter-ion binding to form mixed micelles. which may increase with the addition of TX-100. The H-1 NMR data and FT-IR analysis demonstrated the presence of hydrogen-bond between the imidazolium cation of ILs and the PEO units of Triton X-100 and hydrophobic interactions between the alkyl chain of the imidazolium cation and the hydrophobic chain with phenyl of Triton X-100. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据