4.7 Article

Ultrasonic assisted removal of methylene blue on ultrasonically synthesized zinc hydroxide nanoparticles on activated carbon prepared from wood of cherry tree: Experimental design methodology and artificial neural network

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR LIQUIDS
卷 229, 期 -, 页码 114-124

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2016.12.028

关键词

Artificial neural network; Cherry tree; Kinetic and isotherm; Methylene blue; Response surface methodology; Zinc hydroxide nanoparticles

资金

  1. Graduate School and Research Council of the Shahreza Branch
  2. Islamic Azad University, Shahreza, Iran

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The zinc hydroxide nanoparticles was synthesized and loaded on activated carbon prepared from wood of cherry tree (Zn (OH)(2)-NPs-AC). Prepared NP based adsorbent was used to remove methylene blue (MB) from aqueous medium. The dependency of MB concentration, pH, adsorbent doses and sonication time on the extent of adsorption was investigated and optimized using response surface methodology (RSM) based on central composite design. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was made to calculate coefficient of determination (R-2). The best operation of conditions were determined for MB concentration (12.5 mg L-1), pH (6), adsorbent mass (0.025 g) and sonication time (6.5 min). In addition, all the experimental data was used to train the artificial neural network (ANN) model. Performance evaluation of the ANN model by means of squared error (MSE), average absolute percent deviation (AAD%) and correlation coefficient (R2) depicted the experimental value of MSE = 0.0529, MD = 0.1894% and R-2 = 0.98. These values were better than that of obtained from RSM model (MSE = 2.7107, MD = 1.470%, R-2 = 0.9142). It was noted that the equilibrium isotherm data followed Langmuir model with high adsorption capacity. The adsorption kinetics was efficiently represented by combination of pseudo second order and intraparticle diffusion models. (C)2016 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据