4.6 Article

Multiferroic- and bandgap-tuning in BiFeO3 nanoparticles via Zn and Y co-doping

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10854-017-6927-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. Jiangsu Synergistic Innovation Center for Advanced Materials (SICAM)
  2. Natural Science Foundation of NJUPT [NY214129, NY214130, NY214181]
  3. Seed Project - Introducing Talent Of NJUPT [XK0070915022]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu [KZ0070715050]
  5. College Postgraduate Research and Innovation Project of Jiangsu Province [KYLX_0794, KYLX15_0848]
  6. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51372119, 61377019, 61136003, 51173081]
  7. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD) [YX03001]
  8. Ministry of Education of China [IRT1148]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The pure and Y, Zn co-doped BiFeO3 nanoparticles were synthesized using a sol-gel method. The effect of Zn, Y co-doping on the structural, optical, electrical and magnetic properties is systematically investigated. The X-ray diffraction revealed that Y, Zn co-doping could trigger phase transformation from rhombohedral phase to cubic phase. The surface topography characterized by scanning electron microscope shows that the grain diameter decreased with increase of Y doping concentration. UV-VIS spectroscopy indicates an apparent blue shift compared to that of the undoped sample. Accordingly, the direct optical band gap of doped samples decreases from 1.43 to 1.28 eV. Meanwhile, with the increase of Y element, the leakage current property is improved as the value decreased about two orders of magnitude. Moreover, analyzing from Vibrating sample magnetometer, the magnetic properties of Zn, Y co-doped samples were improved compared to the pure BFO. In this study, the Zn, Y ions not only contribute to tune band gap, but also simultaneously play a key role in multiferroic-tuning, which offers an available way to adjust the band gap and improve the multiferroic properties of BFO based devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据