4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Microscale Morphology Effects of Copper-Graphene Oxide Coatings on Pool Boiling Characteristics

出版社

ASME
DOI: 10.1115/1.4036695

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation under CBET Award [1335927]
  2. Directorate For Engineering
  3. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1335927] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Enhanced pool boiling heat transfer, with simultaneous increase in critical heat flux (CHF) and heat transfer coefficient (HTC), is desired to improve overall system efficiency and reduce equipment size and cost. This paper focuses on combining graphene oxide (GO) and porous copper particles to generate microstructures based on their ability to enhance HTC, CHF, or both. Three pool boiling performance characteristics based on CHF improvements and wall superheat reductions are identified: Type I-reduction in wall superheat only, type II-increase in CHF only, and type III-increase in CHF with reduction in wall superheat at higher heat fluxes. Specific microscale morphologies were generated using (a) screen-printing and (b) electrodeposition techniques. In type-I, rapid bubble activity due to increased availability of nucleation cavities was seen to influence the reduction in the wall superheats, while no increase in CHF was noted. Roughness-augmented wettability was found to be the driving mechanism in type-II enhancement, while wicking and increased nucleation site density were responsible for the enhancement in type-III. An HTC enhancement of similar to 216% in type-I and a CHF improvement of similar to 70% in type-II were achieved when compared to a plain copper surface with water. In type-III enhancement, a CHF of 2.2 MW/m(2) (1.8 x over a plain surface) with a HTC of 155 kW/m(2) degrees C (similar to 2.4 x over a plain surface) was obtained. Furthermore, close correlation between the boiling performance and the microscale surface morphology in these three categories has been identified.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据