4.6 Article

Development of an in vitro model system to study the interactions between Mycobacterium marinum and teleost neutrophils

期刊

DEVELOPMENTAL AND COMPARATIVE IMMUNOLOGY
卷 53, 期 2, 页码 349-357

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dci.2015.07.016

关键词

Fish; Neutrophils; Mycobacterium; Gene expression; Respiratory burst; Phagocytosis; Chemotaxis; Apoptosis

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada (NSERC) [RGPIN-2014-06395]
  2. NSERC doctoral scholarship
  3. Alberta Ingenuity doctoral scholarship
  4. Alberta Innovates doctoral scholarship
  5. NSERC Vanier scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The lack of a reliable mammalian neutrophil in vitro culture system has restricted our ability to examine their precise roles in mycobacterial infections. Previously, we developed the procedures for the isolation and culture of primary kidney-derived neutrophil-like cells from goldfish that are functionally and morphologically similar to mammalian neutrophils. The cultured primary goldfish neutrophils exhibited prolonged viability and functional effector responses. In this study, we demonstrate that when exposed to live or heat-killed Mycobacterium marinum, goldfish neutrophils increased their mRNA levels for several pro-inflammatory cytokines (il-1 beta 1, il-1 beta 2, trf alpha-1, tnf alpha-2) and the cytokine receptors (ifngr1-1, trfr1, tnfr2). These neutrophils also exhibited chemotaxis toward live mycobacteria, internalized the bacilli, and produced reactive oxygen intermediates (ROI) in response to pathogen exposure. The survival of intracellular mycobacteria was significantly reduced in activated neutrophils, indicating a robust killing response by these teleost granulocytes. We suggest that this goldfish primary neutrophil in vitro model system will provide important information regarding neutrophil-mediated host defense mechanisms against mycobacteria in teleosts as well as in higher vertebrates. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据