Making Sense of SNPs: Women’s Understanding and Experiences of Receiving a Personalized Profile of Their Breast Cancer Risks
出版年份 2017 全文链接
标题
Making Sense of SNPs: Women’s Understanding and Experiences of Receiving a Personalized Profile of Their Breast Cancer Risks
作者
关键词
SNPs, Polygenic risk, Genetic testing, Familial breast cancer risk, Qualitative interviews
出版物
Journal of Genetic Counseling
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages 702-708
出版商
Springer Nature
发表日期
2017-11-22
DOI
10.1007/s10897-017-0162-z
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。- Prediction of Breast Cancer Risk Based on Profiling With Common Genetic Variants
- (2015) Nasim Mavaddat et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Genome-wide association analysis of more than 120,000 individuals identifies 15 new susceptibility loci for breast cancer
- (2015) Kyriaki Michailidou et al. NATURE GENETICS
- Prediction of Breast Cancer Risk Based on Profiling With Common Genetic Variants
- (2015) Nasim Mavaddat et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Personalized Medicine Through SNP Testing for Breast Cancer Risk: Clinical Implementation
- (2014) Rebecca Howe et al. Journal of Genetic Counseling
- Interest and Informational Preferences Regarding Genomic Testing for Modest Increases in Colorectal Cancer Risk
- (2014) A.E. Anderson et al. Public Health Genomics
- Incorporating genomics into breast and prostate cancer screening: assessing the implications
- (2013) Susmita Chowdhury et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Effect of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Tests on Health Behaviour and Anxiety: A Survey of Consumers and Potential Consumers
- (2013) Corin Egglestone et al. Journal of Genetic Counseling
- Implementing risk-stratified screening for common cancers: a review of potential ethical, legal and social issues
- (2013) A. E. Hall et al. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
- Large-scale genotyping identifies 41 new loci associated with breast cancer risk
- (2013) Kyriaki Michailidou et al. NATURE GENETICS
- Stratified Cancer Screening: The Practicalities of Implementation
- (2013) T. Dent et al. Public Health Genomics
- A Role for Common Genomic Variants in the Assessment of Familial Breast Cancer
- (2012) Sarah Sawyer et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
- Genetic Counseling as a Tool for Type 2 Diabetes Prevention: A Genetic Counseling Framework for Common Polygenetic Disorders
- (2012) Jessica L. Waxler et al. Journal of Genetic Counseling
- “Is it Really Worth it to Get Tested?”: Primary Care Patients’ Impressions of Predictive SNP Testing for Colon Cancer
- (2012) Kara-Grace Leventhal et al. Journal of Genetic Counseling
- Genome-wide association analysis identifies three new breast cancer susceptibility loci
- (2012) Maya Ghoussaini et al. NATURE GENETICS
- Potential novel candidate polymorphisms identified in genome-wide association study for breast cancer susceptibility
- (2011) Badan Sehrawat et al. HUMAN GENETICS
- Novel Breast Cancer Susceptibility Locus at 9q31.2: Results of a Genome-Wide Association Study
- (2011) Olivia Fletcher et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Impact of communicating personalized genetic risk information on perceived control over the risk: A systematic review
- (2010) Ruth E Collins et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- A locus on 19p13 modifies risk of breast cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriers and is associated with hormone receptor–negative breast cancer in the general population
- (2010) Antonis C Antoniou et al. NATURE GENETICS
- Newly discovered breast cancer susceptibility loci on 3p24 and 17q23.2
- (2009) Shahana Ahmed et al. NATURE GENETICS
- Common Genetic Variation and Human Traits
- (2009) David B. Goldstein NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Genomic Profiles for Disease Risk
- (2008) Kenneth Offit JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Common variants on chromosome 5p12 confer susceptibility to estrogen receptor–positive breast cancer
- (2008) Simon N Stacey et al. NATURE GENETICS
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get StartedAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started