4.2 Article

Formation and development of Staphylococcus biofilm: With focus on food safety

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOD SAFETY
卷 37, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jfs.12358

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFD04012021]
  2. Pearl River SAMP
  3. T Nova Program of Guangzhou
  4. National Outstanding Doctoral Dissertation Funding [201459]
  5. Guangdong Outstanding Doctoral Dissertation Funding [K3140030]
  6. Open Project Program of Key Laboratory for Green Chemical Process of Ministry of Education in Wuhan Institute of Technology [GCP201506]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Staphylococcus is a common gram-positive pathogen, which has been considered to be a leading concern to public health and food safety due to the multi-drag resistance and virulence. As is known, most Staphylococcus tend to form biofilm both during various food processing procedures and in environment, and the bacteria in biofilms show a number of specific advantages over planktonic bacteria due to strong resistance ability. As a consequence, inhibition and removal of Staphylococcus biofilm is difficult for food safety during processing. The present review aims to discuss and demonstrate the formation and development of Staphylococcus biofilm based on food safety account under the background of both phenotype and genetic regulation, providing scientific reference for control strategy. Practical applicationAs a common foodborne pathogen, Staphylococcus aureus in food industry is a potential harm to the health of both customer and stuff. Biofilm plays a significant role in bacterial survival, tolerant to environmental stresses. Thus, a comprehensive understanding of biofilm is of essential and urgent need. This review of biofilm of Staphylococcus aureus illustrated the biofilm in food industry and its formation, influential factor, quantification, genetic regulation mechanism, and control strategies, which provided a background of Staphylococcus aureus biofilm prevention in food industry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据