4.6 Article

Development of a harmonized food grouping system for between-country comparisons in the TEDDY Study

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOD COMPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
卷 63, 期 -, 页码 79-88

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfca.2017.07.037

关键词

Diet; Food analysis; Food composition; Food consumption; Food exposure; Food grouping; Food composition database; Food grouping harmonization; TEDDY study; Type 1 diabetes

资金

  1. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) [U01DK63829, U01DK63861, U01DK63821, U01DK63865, U01DK63863, U01DK63836, U01DK63790, UC4DK63829, UC4DK63861, UC4DK63821, UC4DK63865, UC4DK63863, UC4DK63836, UC4DK95300, UC4DK100238, UC4DK106955, HHSN267200700014C]
  2. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
  3. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
  4. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS)
  5. Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation (JDRF)
  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
  7. NIH/NCATS Clinical and Translational Science Awards [UL1TR000064, UL1TR001082]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young (TEDDY) is an international study aiming to investigate associations between dietary and other environmental factors and the risk of developing islet auto immunity and type 1 diabetes. Dietary intake was assessed using a 24-h recall and repeated 3-day food records and analyzed using country-specific food composition databases (FCDBs) in Finland, Germany, Sweden, and the U.S. with respective in-house calculation programs. A food grouping harmonization process between four country-specific FCDBs was conducted to evaluate and achieve comparability on food group definitions and quantification of food consumption across the countries. Systematic review revealed that the majority of existing food groups of the TEDDY FCDBs were not comparable. Therefore, a completely new classification system of 15 mutually exclusive main food groups (e.g. vegetables) and 89 subgroups (e.g. root vegetables, leafy vegetables) was developed. Foods and beverages were categorized into basic foods (single ingredient) and composite dishes (multiple ingredients). Composite dishes were broken down to ingredients using food composition data available in the FCDBs or generic recipes created for the harmonization effort. The daily consumption of every food group across FCDBs was quantified consistently as either raw or prepared weight depending on the food group to achieve maximal comparability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据