4.5 Article

Net Returns from Terrain-Based Variable-Rate Nitrogen Management on Dryland Spring Wheat in Northern Montana

期刊

AGRONOMY JOURNAL
卷 107, 期 3, 页码 1055-1067

出版社

AMER SOC AGRONOMY
DOI: 10.2134/agronj14.0331

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Montana Wheat and Barley Committee
  2. Montana Fertilizer Tax Fund Advisory Committee
  3. Westco Fertilizers
  4. USDA-IFAFS [2001-52103-11321]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Agricultural producers can use variable-rate application technology to vary N fertilizer within fields. This study was conducted to estimate changes in net returns from implementation of variable-rate N management (VNM) on hard red spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in a summer-fallow region in northern Montana. Net return from uniform N management (UNM) traditionally used by producers was compared with that from VNM in eight dryland fields between 1994 and 2004. Field experiments consisted of a replicated series of four to six N rates applied within strips oriented with the length of each field. Management zones (MZs) were created by dividing the fields into upper slopes, south-facing middle slopes, north-facing middle slopes, and lower slopes. Nitrogen recommendations for MZs were based on soil N testing and expected yields. Grain yield data were obtained using a production-size combine equipped with a yield monitor. Mean grain protein and yield were similar between VNM and UNM. Yield differences were <223 kg ha(-1) and averaged only 18 kg ha(-1). Grain yield did not differ significantly among N rates within MZs. In seven of the eight sites, net returns from VNM were up to US$27.97 ha(-1) less than from UNM and were not profitable if Environmental quality Incentive Program payments of US$6.36 ha(-1) were considered as part of net income. Little evidence existed that VNM based on constructed MZs and predetermined N recommendations improves grain yields and profits or reduces N use in water-limited, summer-fallow systems of northern Montana,

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据