4.4 Article

Evaluation of staghorn coral (Acropora cervicornis, Lamarck 1816) production techniques in an ocean-based nursery with consideration of coral genotype

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jembe.2016.11.013

关键词

Scleractinia; Coral gardening; Aquaculture; Florida Reef Tract; Asexual reproduction

资金

  1. Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary [2011-150-A3]
  2. Mote Marine Laboratory

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Staghorn coral Acropora cervicornis is an important framework-building species that has declined severely throughout the Caribbean since the early 1980s. This species is now widely cultured in ocean-based nurseries to restore degraded populations. A variety of techniques have been adopted to grow A. cervicornis for restoration purposes, however the effect of each of these methods on nursery-reared corals is not well-understood. In particular, systematic evaluation of nursery-reared A. cervicornis between water column-suspended and benthic-attached culture methods is lacking. To better understand the effect of these techniques, a one-year A. cervicornis propagation experiment in the Florida Keys was conducted to compare growth, condition, and survivorship between common suspended (i.e. tree) and benthic-attached (i.e. block) grow-out methods. The effect of coral genotype on growth was also considered. Colonies were measured and monitored monthly from December 2014 until November 2015, when only three colonies had survived an extreme bleaching event. Colonies on trees grew up to three times faster than those on blocks and the location of colonies on trees did not affect growth. Genotype had a significant effect on colony growth, which was consistent across grow-out methods. Interestingly, colonies grown on blocks bleached sooner but survived longer than those on trees. These findings contribute to a growing understanding of A. cervicornis nursery culture, and could aid in the selection of culture methods and genotypes for coral nurseries throughout the wider Caribbean. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据