4.7 Article

Stacks off tracks: a role for the golgin AtCASP in plant endoplasmic reticulum-Golgi apparatus tethering

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
卷 68, 期 13, 页码 3339-3350

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erx167

关键词

Arabidopsis; endomembrane system; endoplasmic reticulum; golgin; Golgi apparatus; optical tweezers; secretory pathway; tethering factor

资金

  1. BBSRC [BB/J000302/1]
  2. Royal Society
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/F008147/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. BBSRC [BB/F008147/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The plant Golgi apparatus modifies and sorts incoming proteins from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and synthesizes cell wall matrix material. Plant cells possess numerous motile Golgi bodies, which are connected to the ER by yet to be identified tethering factors. Previous studies indicated a role for cis-Golgi plant golgins, which are long coiled-coil domain proteins anchored to Golgi membranes, in Golgi biogenesis. Here we show a tethering role for the golgin AtCASP at the ER-Golgi interface. Using live-cell imaging, Golgi body dynamics were compared in Arabidopsis thaliana leaf epidermal cells expressing fluorescently tagged AtCASP, a truncated AtCASP-Delta CC lacking the coiled-coil domains, and the Golgi marker STtmd. Golgi body speed and displacement were significantly reduced in AtCASP-Delta CC lines. Using a dual-colour optical trapping system and a TIRF-tweezer system, individual Golgi bodies were captured in planta. Golgi bodies in AtCASP-Delta CC lines were easier to trap and the ER-Golgi connection was more easily disrupted. Occasionally, the ER tubule followed a trapped Golgi body with a gap, indicating the presence of other tethering factors. Our work confirms that the intimate ER-Golgi association can be disrupted or weakened by expression of truncated AtCASP-Delta CC and suggests that this connection is most likely maintained by a golgin-mediated tethering complex.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据