4.7 Article

Influence of pH and ozone dose on sulfaquinoxaline ozonation

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
卷 195, 期 -, 页码 224-231

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.08.019

关键词

Advanced oxidation processes; Microtox; Molecular ozone; Sulfonamides; Toxicity assays

资金

  1. CAPES
  2. FAPESP [2013/07817-2, 2014/06064-3, 2014/06201-0, 2013/04656-8, 2013/09543-7]
  3. CNPq [479131/2013-9, 459078/2014-3]
  4. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitivity (MINECO) [DPI2013-48243-C2-1-R]
  5. European Regional Development Fund [DPI2013-48243-C2-1-R]
  6. Generalitat de Catalunya [2014SGR-1092-CEPEiMA]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sulfaquinoxaline (SQX) is an antimicrobial of the sulfonamides class. Usually employed in veterinary medicine, this contaminant of emerging concern has been found in superficial and groundwater and its consequences for the environment and human health are not completely known. In this study, SQX (C-0 = 500 mu g L-1,1 L) degradation by an ozonation process at pH 3, 7, and 11 was evaluated. Ozonation was effective in degrading SQX: efficiency exceeding 99% was obtained applying an ozone dose of 2.8 mg L-1 at pH 3. Assays were performed according to a 22 design of experiments (DOE) with star points and three central points for statistical validity. Minimum and maximum levels were set at 3 and 11 for pH, and 0 and 11.5 mg L-1 for applied ozone dose. There was no significant interaction between these variables, and the pH value played the most important role in terms of contaminant degradation. In relation to toxicity, samples ozonated at pH 3 did not inhibit the luminescence of the bacteria, even though different intermediates were formed and identified by mass spectra. At pH 7, inhibition of luminescence remained almost constant (at around 30%) according to ozonation time or ozone dose. However, the hydroxyl radical, the major oxidant at pH 11, was responsible for the formation of toxic intermediates. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据