4.6 Article

Stochastic gravitational waves from cosmic string loops in scaling

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2017/12/027

关键词

Cosmic strings; domain walls; monopoles; gravitational waves / sources; gravitational waves / theory; physics of the early universe

资金

  1. JSPS [15K17632]
  2. MEXT KAKENHI [17H06357, 17H06358]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15K17632, 17H06357] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

If cosmic strings are formed in the early universe, their associated loops emit gravitational waves during the whole cosmic history and contribute to the stochastic gravitational wave background at all frequencies. We provide a new estimate of the stochastic gravitational wave spectrum by considering a realistic cosmological loop distribution, in scaling, as it can be inferred from Nambu-Goto numerical simulations. Our result takes into account various effects neglected so far. We include both gravitational wave emission and backreaction effects on the loop distribution and show that they produce two distinct features in the spectrum. Concerning the string microstructure, in addition to the presence of cusps and kinks, we show that gravitational wave bursts created by the collision of kinks could dominate the signal for wiggly strings, a situation which may be favoured in the light of recent numerical simulations. In view of these new results, we propose four prototypical scenarios, within the margin of the remaining theoretical uncertainties, for which we derive the corresponding signal and estimate the constraints on the string tension put by both the LIGO and European Pulsar Timing Array ( EPTA) observations. The less constrained of these scenarios is shown to have a string tension GU <= 7.2 x 10(-11,) at 95% of confidence. Smooth loops carrying two cusps per oscillation verify the two-sigma bound GU <= 1.0 x 10(-11) while the most constrained of all scenarios describes very kinky loops and satisfies GU <= 6.7 x 10(-14) at 95% of confidence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据