4.6 Article

Dark Matter's secret liaisons: phenomenology of a dark U(1) sector with bound states

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2017/05/036

关键词

dark matter theory; absorption and radiation processes; dark matter experiments; cosmology of theories beyond the SM

资金

  1. European Research Council (ERC) under the EU Seventh Framework Programme (FP7)/ERC Starting Grant [278234]
  2. French state funds [ANR-11-IDEX-0004-02, ANR-10-LABX-63]
  3. ANR (Agence Nationale de la Recherche)
  4. NWO (The Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research), VIDI grant, 'SELF INTERACTING ASYMMETRIC DARK MATTER' project
  5. ERC Advanced Grant [267117]
  6. Centro de Excelencia Severo Ochoa Programme [SEV-2012-0249]
  7. MINECO through a Severo Ochoa fellowship [SEV-2012-0249]
  8. Consolider MultiDark [CSD2009-00064]
  9. [FPA2015-65929-P]
  10. European Research Council (ERC) [267117] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dark matter (DM) charged under a dark U(1) force appears in many extensions of the Standard Model, and has been invoked to explain anomalies in cosmic-ray data, as well as a self-interacting DM candidate. In this paper, we perform a comprehensive phenomenological analysis of such a model, assuming that the DM abundance arises from the thermal freeze-out of the dark interactions. We include, for the first time, bound-state effects both in the DM production and in the indirect detection signals, and quantify their importance for Fermi, AMS, and CMB experiments. We find that DM in the mass range 1 GeV to 100 TeV, annihilating into dark photons of MeV to GeV mass, is in conflict with observations. Instead, DM annihilation into heavier dark photons is viable. We point out that the late decays of multi-GeV dark photons can produce significant entropy and thus dilute the DM density. This can lower considerably the dark coupling needed to obtain the DM abundance, and in turn relax the existing constraints.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据