4.7 Article

HbA1c Identifies Subjects With Prediabetes and Subclinical Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
卷 102, 期 10, 页码 3756-3764

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2017-00954

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context: Prediabetes is associated with subclinical cardiac changes associated with heart failure development. Objective: We investigated diastolic function and its association with markers of glycation and inflammation related to cardiovascular disease in patients with prediabetes. We focused on individuals with prediabetes identified only by glycated hemoglobin A1c [HbA(1c); 5.7% to 6.4% and normal fasting glucose (NFG) and normal glucose tolerance (NGT) after an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)]. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Departments of Clinical and Experimental Medicine and Cardiology, University of Catania, Catania, Italy. Main Outcome Measures: HbA(1c), OGTT, Doppler echocardiography, soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products (sRAGEs), and endogenous secretory RAGE (esRAGE) were evaluated. Patients: We recruited 167 subjects with NFG/NGT who were stratified according to HbA(1c) level: controls (HbA(1c),5.7%) and HbA1c prediabetes (HbA(1c) 5.7% to 6.4%). Results: Patients with HbA1c prediabetes (n = 106) showed a lower peak mitral inflow in early diastole (E wave) to late diastolic atrial filling velocity (A wave) ratio (E/A ratio) than controls (n = 61) (1.10 +/- 0.24 vs 1.18 +/- 0.23; P < 0.05). They showed a higher left atrium volume (LAV) (28.4 +/- 5 vs 22.1 +/- 3; P <0.05) and sphericity index (SI) (0.6 +/- 0.06 vs 0.5 +/- 0.05; P < 0.05). After multiple regression analyses, HbA1c, sRAGE, and esRAGE were the major determinants of E/A ratio, LAV, and SI. Conclusions: Subjects with HbA(1c) prediabetes exhibited subclinical cardiac alterations associatedwith sRAGE, esRAGE, and HbA(1c). These subjects would not have been classified as having prediabetes on the basis of fastingglycemiaor post-OGTT values.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据