4.7 Article

The effect of lightweighting in automotive LCA perspective: Estimation of mass-induced fuel consumption reduction for gasoline turbocharged vehicles

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 154, 期 -, 页码 566-577

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.013

关键词

Automotive; Fuel Consumption (FC); Fuel Reduction Value (FRV); Life Cycle Assessment (LCA); Lightweighting; Mass-induced FC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper proposes a method aimed to support Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) in the evaluation of environmental benefits achievable by lightweight design solutions in the automotive field. The study is based on an in-depth calculation of car weight-induced Fuel Consumption (FC) resulting in the Fuel Reduction Value (FRV) coefficient; this is functional in modelling the use stage in a LCA perspective. The research is focused on Gasoline Turbocharged (GT) cars, since to date there is no systematic analysis of weight induced FC reduction regarding this propulsion technology. The FRV is evaluated for a wide range of vehicle case studies representative of different classes within the 2015 European market. The assessment is performed concentrating on four standardized driving cycles in order to evaluate various driving styles both in the case of primary mass reduction only and in the case of secondary effect (powertrain adaptation in order to maintain vehicle's performance). For the vehicle case studies under consideration, FRV is within the range 0.159-0.237 and 0.252-0.477 1/100 km*100 kg respectively for mass reduction only and secondary effect. Starting from the data obtained, a criterion is refined for estimating the FRV coefficient based on car technical features. Such a method allows to estimate FC reduction precisely by means of the value of FRV closest to the specific application, and it is proposed as a valuable tool for LCA practitioners within the automotive lightweight context. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据