4.5 Article

Investigation of the performance of biocompatible gas hydrate inhibitors via combined experimental and DFT methods

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THERMODYNAMICS
卷 111, 期 -, 页码 7-19

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2017.03.013

关键词

Gas hydrates; Ionic liquids; Thermodynamic inhibitors; Flow assurance; Phase behaviour

资金

  1. NPRP grant from the Qatar National Research Fund (Qatar Foundation) [6-330-2-140, 5-590-2-238]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, three ionic liquids (ILs) from the bio-compatible family of choline cations attached to anions of varying hydrophobicity namely: choline acetate (ChOAc), choline bistriflamide (ChNtf(2)), and choline chloride (ChCl), have been tested for their gas hydrate inhibition properties for methane and a multicomponent Qatari natural gas type mixture (QNG-S1). A rocking-rig assembly (RC-5) has been used to obtain the pressure-temperature (P-T) loops for the studied systems in absence/presence of inhibitors. Two concentrations of 1 and 5 wt% for the choline IL-inhibitors have been chosen which shows distinct effectiveness towards studied single and multi-component hydrate systems. Hydrate suppression temperatures (Delta T) have been calculated from the obtained dissociation data for quantitative analysis of inhibition effect of ILs and its trends against pressure dependence were discussed. Further, to understand the mechanism of hydrate formation and dissociation, the imaging of a complete P-T loop for CH4 + 5 wt% ChNtf2 system has been performed using a borescope camera attached to gas hydrate autoclave (GHA) apparatus. Furthermore, the main features of the interaction mechanism between selected ionic liquids and hydrate structures were elucidated at the molecular level through quantum chemical calculations by using density functional theory (DFT) methods. The results on the effectiveness of bio-compatible ILs as hydrate inhibitors compared to their conventional counterparts have been proposed in the manuscript. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据