4.7 Article

An EQT-based cDFT approach for thermodynamic properties of confined fluid mixtures

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 146, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/1.4979896

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF [1264282, 1420882, 1506619, 1545907]
  2. AFOSR [FA9550-12-1-0464]
  3. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  4. Division of Computing and Communication Foundations [GRANTS:13980128, 1420882] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Directorate For Engineering
  6. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1264282] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Directorate For Engineering
  8. Div Of Electrical, Commun & Cyber Sys [1506619] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present an empirical potential-based quasi-continuum theory (EQT) to predict the structure and thermodynamic properties of confined fluid mixtures. The central idea in the EQT is to construct potential energies that integrate important atomistic details into a continuum-based model such as the Nernst-Planck equation. The EQT potentials can be also used to construct the excess free energy functional, which is required for the grand potential in the classical density functional theory (cDFT). In this work, we use the EQT-based grand potential to predict various thermodynamic properties of a confined binary mixture of hydrogen and methane molecules inside graphene slit channels of different widths. We show that the EQT-cDFT predictions for the structure, surface tension, solvation force, and local pressure tensor profiles are in good agreement with the molecular dynamics simulations. Moreover, we study the effect of different bulk compositions and channel widths on the thermodynamic properties. Our results reveal that the composition of methane in the mixture can significantly affect the ordering of molecules and thermodynamic properties under confinement. In addition, we find that graphene is selective to methane molecules. Published by AIP Publishing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据