4.5 Article

Telocytes in normal and keratoconic human cornea: an immunohistochemical and transmission electron microscopy study

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR MEDICINE
卷 21, 期 12, 页码 3602-3611

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.13270

关键词

telocytes; stromal cells; human cornea; keratoconus; immunohistochemistry; transmission electron microscopy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Telocytes (TC) are typically defined as cells with telopodes by their ultrastructural features. Their presence was reported in the interstitium of various organs in vertebrates, including humans. However, no study has yet described the presence of TC in the human eye and in particular, within the stromal compartment of the cornea. To address this issue, samples of normal and pathologic (keratoconic) human corneas were tested by immunohistochemistry for CD34, platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha(PDGFR alpha) and c-kit/CD117 or examined by transmission electron microscopy. We found that TC coexpressing CD34 and PDGFR were distributed throughout the whole normal corneal stroma with different TC subtypes being distinguishable on the basis of the expression of the stemness marker c-kit (i.e. c-kit-positive and c-kit-negative TC subpopulations). Transmission electron microscopy examination confirmed the existence of spindle-shaped and bipolar TC typically displaying two long and thin moniliform telopodes establishing intercellular contacts formed by gap junctions. Keratoconic corneas were characterized by ultrastructural damages and patchy loss of TC with an almost complete depletion of the c-kit-positive TC subpopulation. We propose that TC may contribute to the maintenance of corneal stromal homoeostasis and that, in particular, the c-kit-positive TC subtype might have stemness capacity participating in corneal regeneration and repair processes. Further studies are needed to clarify the differential roles of corneal TC subtypes as well as the possible therapeutic applications of TC in degenerative corneal disorders such as keratoconus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据