4.8 Article

Supported gold clusters as effective and reusable photocatalysts for the abatement of endocrine-disrupting chemicals under visible light

期刊

JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS
卷 354, 期 -, 页码 1-12

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2017.07.027

关键词

Gold clusters; Photocatalysis; TiO2; Visible light; Endocrine disruptors; Environmental remediation

资金

  1. Research Grant Council of Hong Kong through the General Research Funds [11337116]
  2. City University of Hong Kong through the Strategic Research Funds [7004468]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Photocatalysts based on glutathione-protected Au clusters (1.5 +/- 0.4 nm) were synthesized and assessed for the visible-light degradation of ten different endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) and related compounds. In its as-prepared form, the Au clusters undergo rapid photocharge recombination resulting in no appreciable photocatalytic activity. Coupling with non-activated TiO2 acceptor was necessary to achieve efficient interfacial charge separation that allowed the photocharges on the Au clusters to be effectively harvested for surface redox reactions. Under visible light excitation, the Au cluster undergoes ligand-to-metal charge transfer and resulting in the accumulation of photohole on the glutathione ligand (i.e., the HOMO state). The transfer of photoholes to the hydrogen-bonded EDCs is identified as the main oxidation pathway. The hole transfer oxidation, which was probably complemented by superoxide radicals attack, was necessary since the low HOMO level of the Au clusters (+1.21 V vs. RHE, pH 0) disallowed the production of hydroxyl radicals (+2.68 V vs. RHE, pH 0). As such, the photocatalytic degradation rates of EDCs are in accordance with the trend of Langmuir adsorption capacities. Lastly, we demonstrated the high reusability of the Au cluster/TiO2 photocatalyst, retaining 96% of the initial activity even after 5 repeated cycles or equivalent to 25 h of continuous irradiation. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据