4.3 Article

Serum butyrylcholinesterase and zinc in breast cancer

期刊

JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS
卷 13, 期 2, 页码 367-370

出版社

WOLTERS KLUWER MEDKNOW PUBLICATIONS
DOI: 10.4103/0973-1482.165869

关键词

Breast cancer; butyrylcholinesterase; zinc

类别

资金

  1. Kasturba Medical College, Manipal [ACCT/PGGRANT/2014-15]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context: Even though, a large number of serological, molecular markers have been proposed for breast cancer screening, most of them lack specificity, sensitivity, prognostic value, and cost effectiveness. Butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) and its genes are aberrantly expressed in a variety of human cancers. It has-been linked to tumorigenesis, cell proliferation, and cell differentiation. Zinc (Zn) is a cofactor for superoxide dismutase, an enzyme that protects cellular components against free radical-induced damage and carcinogenesis. Therefore, the aim of present study was to estimate and compare serum BChE and serum Zn levels in healthy controls and biopsy proven breast cancer patients before definitive therapy. Aims: To estimate and compare serum BChE and serum Zn levels in healthy controls and biopsy proven breast cancer patients before definitive therapy. Settings and Design: Serum BChE and Zn were estimated in 46 newly diagnosed (preoperative) female patients with breast cancer and 50 healthy female volunteers. Subjects and Methods: Serum BChE and Zn were estimated by spectrophotometric method. Statistical Analysis Used: Data was expressed as median and inter quartile range. Comparisons between different stages of cancer were done using Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: There was a significant increase in serum BChE and Zn in breast cancer patients compared to controls (P < 0.001). Serum BChE showed a significant increase and Zn was significantly decreased in different stages of breast cancer. Conclusions: Both BChE and Zn are inexpensive and can easily be analyzed and may play a role in the management of breast cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据