4.5 Article

Short and long gap peripheral nerve repair with magnesium metal filaments

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART A
卷 105, 期 11, 页码 3148-3158

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.36176

关键词

peripheral nerve repair; magnesium metal; biodegradable metal; biocompatibility; sciatic nerve

资金

  1. NSF ERC for Revolutionizing Metallic Biomaterials [EEC-0812348, NCAT 260116 C]
  2. American Association of Hand Surgeons, Annual Research Grant
  3. University of Cincinnati Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A current clinical challenge is to replace autografts for repair of injury gaps in peripheral nerves, which can occur due to trauma or surgical interruption. Biodegradable metallic magnesium filaments, placed inside hollow nerve conduits, could support nerve repair by providing contact guidance support for axonal regeneration. This was tested by repairing sciatic nerves of adult rats with single magnesium filaments placed inside poly(caprolactone) nerve conduits. Controls were empty conduits, conduits containing titanium filaments and/or isografts from donor rats. With a nerve gap of 6 mm and 6 weeks post-repair, magnesium filaments had partially resorbed. Regenerating cells had attached to the filaments and axons were observed in distal stumps in all animals. Axon parameters were improved with magnesium compared to conduits alone or conduits with single titanium filaments. With a longer gap of 15 mm and 16 weeks post-repair, functional parameters were improved with isografts, but not with magnesium filaments or empty conduits. Magnesium filaments were completely resorbed and no evidence of scarring was seen. While axon outgrowth was not improved with the longer gap, histological measures of the tissues were improved with magnesium compared to empty conduits. Therefore, the use of magnesium filaments is promising because they are biocompatible and improve aspects of nerve regeneration. (c) 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 105A: 3148-3158, 2017.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据