4.5 Article

Evaluation of an aortic valve prosthesis: Fluid-structure interaction or structural simulation?

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS
卷 58, 期 -, 页码 45-51

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.04.004

关键词

Fluid-structure interaction; Polymeric heart valve; Finite element analysis; Cardiovascular mechanics

资金

  1. British Heart Foundation [NH/11/4/29059, SP/15/5/31548]
  2. MRC [MC_PC_14116] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. British Heart Foundation [NH/11/4/29059, SP/15/5/31548] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bio-inspired polymeric heart valves (PHVs) are excellent candidates to mimic the structural and the fluid dynamic features of the native valve. PHVs can be implanted as prosthetic alternative to currently clinically used mechanical and biological valves or as potential candidate for a minimally invasive treatment, like the transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Nevertheless, PHVs are not currently used for clinical applications due to their lack of reliability. In order to investigate the main features of this new class of prostheses, pulsatile tests in an in-house pulse duplicator were carried out and reproduced in silico with both structural Finite-Element (FE) and Fluid-Structure interaction (FSI) analyses. Valve kinematics and geometric orifice area (GOA) were evaluated to compare the in vitro and the in silico tests. Numerical results showed better similarity with experiments for the FSI than for the FE simulations. The maximum difference between experimental and FSI GOA at maximum opening time was only 5%, as compared to the 46.5% between experimental and structural FE GOA. The stress distribution on the valve leaflets clearly reflected the difference in valve kinematics. Higher stress values were found in the FSI simulations with respect to those obtained in the FE simulation. This study demonstrates that FSI simulations are more appropriate than FE simulations to describe the actual behaviour of PHVs as they can replicate the valve-fluid interaction while providing realistic fluid dynamic results. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据