4.4 Article

Understanding actor-centered adaptation limits in smallholder agriculture in the Central American dry tropics

期刊

AGRICULTURE AND HUMAN VALUES
卷 33, 期 4, 页码 785-797

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10460-015-9661-4

关键词

Adaptation limits; Transformative adaptation; Livelihood goals; Global change risks; Smallholder farming; Tradeoffs; Rural development; Costa Rica

资金

  1. C.W. & Modene Neely Charitable Foundation
  2. Organization for Tropical Studies National Science Foundation [0553925, 1132840]
  3. GISER Integrative Society and Environment Research Program
  4. Office Of The Director
  5. Office Of Internatl Science &Engineering [0553925] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Office Of The Director
  7. Office Of Internatl Science &Engineering [1132840] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adaptations made by agrarian households in the face of global change risks are largely dependent on their livelihood goals. I argue that adaptation-limit research is crucial to many agrarian development programs because a focus on adaptation limits may allow researchers and practitioners to better understand and support successful adaptation and allow smallholders to pursue their goals. In this study of smallholder farming in Northwest Costa Rica, I found that security and the unique parcelero identity of rice farmers in this region define livelihood goals. I show that an understanding of the multidimensionality and fluidity of farmer livelihood goals may enrich our current understanding of actor-centered adaptation limits as insurmountable thresholds. In response to worsening global change risks, farmers in this study traded off certain goals to pursue others. In this way, farmers do not perceive adaptation limits as insurmountable. Alternative indicators of adaptation limits did exist; irreversibility in adaptation and the great hardship associated with tradeoffs among livelihood goals may mark adaptation limits.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据