4.7 Article

Hierarchical NiCo2O4@ NiCoAl-layered double hydroxide core/shell nanoforest arrays as advanced electrodes for high-performance asymmetric supercapacitors

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 724, 期 -, 页码 130-138

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.06.256

关键词

Asymmetric supercapacitor; Energy storage; Hierarchical core/shell structure; NiCo2O4; Layered double hydroxide

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC 61473095]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds of the Central University (HEUCFM)
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province [B2015021]
  4. International Science & Technology Cooperation Program of China [2015DFR50050]
  5. Major Project of Science and Technology of Heilongjiang Province [GA14A101]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A combination of hydrothermal synthesis and a step-by-step in situ structure fabrication process for growing a hierarchical core/shell structure of NiCo2O4@ NiCoAl-LDH onto nickel foam without binders and conductive agents is presented. For supercapacitor electrodes, the as-obtained NiCo2O4@ NiCoAl-LDH nanoforest displays an enhanced specific capacitance of 1814.24 F g(-1) at a current density of 1 A g(-1) and a cycling performance with a retention of 93% after 2000 cycles at 10 A g(-1). Moreover, an asymmetric supercapacitor based on NiCo2O4@ NiCoAl-LDH nanoforest electrode and activated carbon electrode achieves an excellent electrochemical property with the energy density of 74.64 Wh kg(-1) at the power density of 800 W kg(-1) and good cycling stability (retaining 86% after 2000 cycles). The improved electrochemical performance is attributed to the hierarchical core/shell structure and synergistic effect of active materials, which enhance the interfacial charge transmission and shorten the diffusion path of ions. These results demonstrate that the hierarchical core/shell NiCo2O4@ NiCoAl-LDH nanoforest arrays are promising for supercapacitor applications. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据