4.7 Review

In situ preparation of magnetic Ni-Au/graphene nanocomposites with electron-enhanced catalytic performance

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 706, 期 -, 页码 377-386

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.02.192

关键词

Reduced graphene oxide; Ni-Au catalyst; 4-Nitrophenol; Reduction/degradation reaction

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61671299, 61574091, 51402190]
  2. Shanghai Science and Technology [16JC1402000]
  3. Program of Shanghai Academic/Technology Research Leader [15XD1525200]
  4. Program for Professor of Special Appointment (Eastern Scholar) at Shanghai Institutions of Higher Learning [GZ206005]
  5. Instrumental Analysis Centre of Shanghai Jiao Tong University
  6. Centre for Advanced Electronic Materials and Devices of Shanghai Jiao Tong University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Design supported bimetallic nanoparticles is an interesting and important strategy for developing new catalysts with enhanced activity and selectivity. Herein the magnetically separable reduced graphene oxide supported Ni-Au (RGO-Ni-Au) nanocatalysts were prepared by an in situ co-reduction and surfactant-free method, which exhibited excellent performance both in the catalytic reduction of 4-nitrophenol and degradation of environmentally polluting dyes with NaBH4. The best activity parameters of RGO-Ni-Au-6h nanocomposites for 4-nitrophenol reduction is 36.77 s(-1) g(-1) with an apparent rate constant of 11.03 x 10(-3) s(-1). Additionally, the prepared catalyst could be recycled over 6 times without obvious performance decay or even a morphology change. The enhancement in catalytic capability can be ascribed to the electron-enhanced effect of graphene support and strong synergistic effect between noble metal and magnetic transition metal. It is believed that such desirable catalyst with magnetic properties, high activity, and long-life stability make it promising in retrievable catalysis. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据