4.7 Article

Systemic innate immune activation in food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 139, 期 6, 页码 1885-+

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.12.971

关键词

Food allergy; non-IgE; FPIES; innate; CyTOF; RNA-sequencing

资金

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [NIAID R01AI093577, NIAID U24AI118644]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES) is a non-IgE-mediated food allergy of infancy whose pathophysiology is poorly understood. Objectives: We set out to identify and phenotype allergen-responsive cells in peripheral blood of a cohort of subjects undergoing supervised food challenge for FPIES. Methods: We profiled antigen-responsive cells in PBMCs by flow cytometry, and examined cells in whole blood obtained before and after challenge by CyTOF mass cytometry and RNAseq. Results: Using a CD154-based detection approach, we observed that milk, soy, or rice-responsive T cells, and TNF-alpha-producing CD154(+) T cells, were significantly lower in those with outgrown FPIES compared with those with active FPIES. However, levels were within the normal range and were inconsistent with a role in the pathophysiology of FPIES. Profiling of whole blood by CyTOF demonstrated profound activation of cells of the innate immune system after food challenge, including monocytes, neutrophils, natural killer cells, and eosinophils. Activation was not observed in children with outgrown FPIES. We confirmed this pattern of innate immune activation in a larger cohort by RNAseq. Furthermore, we observed pan-T-cell activation and redistribution from the circulation after a positive food challenge but not in those who had outgrown their FPIES. Conclusions: Our data demonstrate a compelling role of systemic innate immune activation in adverse reactions elicited by foods in FPIES. Further investigation is needed to identify the mechanism of antigen specificity of adverse reactions to foods in FPIES.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据