4.7 Article

Application of Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry To Determine Urinary Concentrations of Five Commonly Used Low Calorie Sweeteners: A Novel Biomarker Approach for Assessing Recent Intakes?

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 65, 期 22, 页码 4516-4525

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b00404

关键词

low-calorie sweeteners; intense sweeteners; biomarkers; urinary biomarkers; exposure; food additives; human urine

资金

  1. National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) in The Netherlands

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although the use of low-calorie sweeteners (LCSs) is widespread, methods of assessing consumption within freeliving populations have inherent limitations. Five commonly consumed LCSs, namely, acesulfarne-K, saccharin, sucralose, cyclamate, and steviol glycosides, are excreted via the urine, and therefore a urinary biomarker approach may provide more objective LCS intake data. A LC-ESI-MS/MS method of simultaneously determining acesulfame-K, saccharin, sucralose, cyclamate, and the excretory metabolite of steviol glycosides, steviol glucuronide, in human urine was developed and validated. Linearity was observed over a concentration range of 10-1000 ng/mL with coefficients of determination ranging from 0.9969 to 0.9997. Accuracy ranged from 92 to 104%, and intrabatch and interday precisions were within acceptable limits with %CV below 8% for all compounds. A double-blind, randomized crossover dose response study was conducted to assess the usefulness of urinary LCS excretions (from both fasting spot and a full 24-h urine collection) for investigating recent intakes. Both modes of sampling were useful for distinguishing between the three short-term intakes of acesulfame-K, saccharin, cyclamates, and steviol glycosides (p < 0.001), whereas for sucralose, urinary concentrations were useful for distinguishing between low (0.1% ADI) and high doses (10% ADI) only (p < 0.001). In summary, this biomarker approach maybe useful for assessing intakes of five commonly consumed LCSs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据