4.3 Article

Nanowire size dependence on sensitivity of silicon nanowire field-effect transistor-based pH sensor

期刊

JAPANESE JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
卷 56, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.7567/JJAP.56.124001

关键词

-

资金

  1. Brain Korea 21 Plus Project
  2. Future Semiconductor Device Technology Development Program - MOTIE (Ministry of Trade, Industry Energy) [10067739]
  3. KSRC (Korea Semiconductor Research Consortium)
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korean Government [2013R1A1A2065339, 2016R1A5A1012966, 2016R1A6A3A01006588]
  5. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [10067739] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  6. National Research Foundation of Korea [2013R1A1A2065339, 2016R1A6A3A01006588] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we investigated the effects of nanowire size on the current sensitivity of silicon nanowire (SiNW) ion-sensitive field-effect transistors (ISFETs). The changes in on-current (Ion) and resistance according to pH were measured in fabricated SiNW ISFETs of various lengths and widths. As a result, it was revealed that the sensitivity expressed as relative Ion change improves as the width decreases. Through technology computer-aided design (TCAD) simulation analysis, the width dependence on the relative Ion change can be explained by the observation that the target molecules located at the edge region along the channel width have a stronger effect on the sensitivity as the SiNW width is reduced. Additionally, the length dependence on the sensitivity can be understood in terms of the resistance ratio of the fixed parasitic resistance, including source/drain resistance, to the varying channel resistance as a function of channel length. (C) 2017 The Japan Society of Applied Physics

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据