4.8 Article

Alpine soil carbon is vulnerable to rapid microbial decomposition under climate cooling

期刊

ISME JOURNAL
卷 11, 期 9, 页码 2102-2111

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2017.75

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Basic Research Program of China [2013CB956601]
  2. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB15010102]
  3. National Science Foundation of China [41471202, 41230750, 41430856]
  4. National Basic Research Program [2013CB956000]
  5. United States Department of Energy, Biological Systems Research on the Role of Microbial Communities in Carbon Cycling Program [DE-SC0010715]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As climate cooling is increasingly regarded as important natural variability of long-term global warming trends, there is a resurging interest in understanding its impact on biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Here, we report a soil transplant experiment from lower to higher elevations in a Tibetan alpine grassland to simulate the impact of cooling on ecosystem community structure and function. Three years of cooling resulted in reduced plant productivity and microbial functional potential (for example, carbon respiration and nutrient cycling). Microbial genetic markers associated with chemically recalcitrant carbon decomposition remained unchanged despite a decrease in genes associated with chemically labile carbon decomposition. As a consequence, cooling-associated changes correlated with a decrease in soil organic carbon (SOC). Extrapolation of these results suggests that for every 1 degrees C decrease in annual average air temperature, 0.1 Pg (0.3%) of SOC would be lost from the Tibetan plateau. These results demonstrate that microbial feedbacks to cooling have the potential to differentially impact chemically labile and recalcitrant carbon turnover, which could lead to strong, adverse consequences on soil C storage. Our findings are alarming, considering the frequency of short-term cooling and its scale to disrupt ecosystems and biogeochemical cycling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据