4.4 Article

Micropepsis pineolensis gen. nov., sp nov., a mildly acidophilic alphaproteobacterium isolated from a poor fen, and proposal of Micropepsaceae fam. nov within Micropepsales ord. nov.

出版社

MICROBIOLOGY SOC
DOI: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001681

关键词

peatland; bacteria; Alphaproteobacteria; Micropepsales

资金

  1. Appalachian Women Scientists, Appalachian State University Office of Student Research
  2. Cratis D. Williams Graduate School

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An obligately anaerobic, mildly acidophilic, fermentative alphaproteobacterium, designated strain CS4(T), was isolated from an acidic, oligotrophic (nutrient poor) poor fen located near Pineola, NC, USA. Cultures contained Gram-negative, slightly curved, non-motile, non-spore-forming, non-prosthecate rods (0.1-0.4 mu m in diameter and 0.4-4 mu m long, depending, in part, on the growth substrate). Growth optima were 35 degrees C (range 15-35 degrees C), pH 5.6 (range of 5.0-6.8), and with 0-50mM added NaCl (range, 0-100mM added NaCl). The culture fermented cellobiose, D-glucose, D-mannose, fructose, galactose, glycerol, lactose, maltose, peptone, sucrose, trehalose and xylose. Respiratory growth was not detected. Major fatty acids were C-18 : 1 omega 7c, C-19 : 0 cyclo omega 8c, C-14 : 0 and C-16 : 0. The G+C content of the DNA was 61.9 +/- 0.3 mol%. The two most closely related species phylogenetically, Rhizomicrobium palustre A48(1) (AB081581) and Rhizomicrobium electricum Mfc52(1) (AB365487) shared 94 and 93% SSU rRNA gene sequence identity, respectively, to that of strain CS4(T). Lower SSU rRNA gene sequence identities resulted from pairwise comparisons with members of the order 'Rhizobiales' (85-88 %) or Sphingomonadales (85-86 %). These findings all support the classification of strain CS4(T) as representative of a novel genus, family and order of Alphaproteobacteria. The type strain of the species pineolensis within the genus Micropepsis, family Micropepsaceae and order Micropepsales is CS4(T) (= JCM 30711(T) = ATCC BAA-2724(T)).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据