4.6 Article

Port economics comprehensive scores for major cities in the Yangtze Valley, China using the DMSP-OLS night-time light imagery

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING
卷 38, 期 21, 页码 6007-6029

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2017.1312034

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [41101407, 41371183]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province, China [2014CFB377, 2010CDZ005]
  3. colleges' basic research and operation of MOE [CCNU15A02001, CCNU16JCZX09]
  4. Wuhan Youth Science and technology plan [2016070204010137]
  5. National undergraduate training programmes for innovation and entrepreneurship [201410511037]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this article, the Defence Meteorological Satellite Program Operational Linescan System (DMSP-OLS) night-time light remotely sensed data on a small scale is proposed to evaluate port economic comprehensive scores (PECS) for the ports of the major cities, including Shanghai, Nanjing, Wuhan, and Chongqing, in the Yangtze River Valley, China. First, the concept and calculation method of port night-time light intensity (PNLI) are proposed. Second, an estimation method of PECS is proposed using factor analysis. Third, two regression models (i.e. first- and second-order polynomials) between PNLI and PECS are built and tested. The goodness-of-fit of the two models are compared, both with and without outliers. Finally, experimental results show that the proposed methods for evaluating PECS in the Yangtze River Valley, China are feasible. Wuhan has the strongest correlation (R-2=0.925) and passes the F-test, F-t=55.429 > 4.26=F-t(0.05) (2, 9); Shanghai has the weakest correlation (R-2: 0.688) but still passes as well, F-t=9.944 > 4.26=F-t(0.05) (2, 9). Factors confounding the correlation for Shanghai are discussed. Overall, this study not only proposes a new set of methods to evaluate the performance of port economies but also provides a feasible way to use DMSP-OLS data to study the geographic problems of small scales.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据