4.7 Article

Highly sensitive protein detection via covalently linked aptamer to MoS2 and exonuclease-assisted amplification strategy

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NANOMEDICINE
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 7847-7853

出版社

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S145585

关键词

Molybdenum disulfide; aptamer; thrombin; protein detection; high sensitivity

资金

  1. Jiangsu University [13JDG005, Y15A171]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province [201601268]
  3. Universities Natural Science Research Project of Jiangsu Province [15KJB180001]
  4. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) has shown highly attractive superiority as a platform for sensing. However, DNA physisorption on the surface of MoS2 was susceptible to nonspecific probe displacement and false-positive signals. To solve these problems, we have developed a novel MoS2-aptamer nanosheet biosensor for detecting thrombin using a covalently linked aptamer to the MoS2 nanosheet. Ten percent Tween 80 was used to prevent thrombin from nonspecific binding and to rapidly form thiol-DNA/gold nanoparticle (AuNP) conjugates. Furthermore, an MoS2 and exonuclease coassisted signal amplification strategy was developed to improve the detection limit for thrombin. We used the hybridization of the aptamer molecules and the matched strand with a 5 ' terminal thiol to immobilize the aptamer molecules on the surface of AuNPs in AuNPs@MoS2 nanocomposites. Exonuclease digested the single-strand aptamer and released the thrombin, which was then detected in the next recycle. With the coassisted amplification strategy, a 6 fM detection limit was achieved, showing that this method has higher sensitivity than most reported methods for thrombin detection. The results presented in this work show that this method of covalently attaching the aptamer and using the coassisted amplification is a promising technique for the detection of protein in medical diagnostics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据