4.5 Article

Characterisation of gas-liquid two-phase flow in minichannels with co-flowing fluid injection inside the channel, part II: gas bubble and liquid slug lengths, film thickness, and void fraction within Taylor flow

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIPHASE FLOW
卷 88, 期 -, 页码 251-269

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2016.09.002

关键词

Bubble length; Contactor; Gas-liquid; Hydrodynamics; Multiphase flow; Taylor flow

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [LA/1416/9-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Current research proofs the potential of apparatuses containing minichannel flow structures to intensify gas-liquid-solid contacting processes. The excellent heat and mass transfer in these devices as well as a sharp RTD mainly result from the Taylor flow regime. A proper design of corresponding contactors requires precise information on the provided interfacial areas. However, the characterisation of gas-liquid Taylor flow with industrially relevant fluids at elevated pressure and created by capillary injection devices gained little attention so far. This work analyses adiabatic gas-liquid Taylor flow in a square minichannel of 1.0 mm hydraulic diameter using water, water-glycerol, or water-ethanol mixtures as liquid phase and hydrogen or nitrogen as gas phase to cover a broad range of material parameters. In the mixing zone located within the flow channel, gas was injected into the co-flowing liquid by so-called capillary injectors with variable inner diameter (0.184, 0.317, 0.490 mm). Two different bubble forming mechanisms were identified leading to a complex interaction between physical properties of the fluids, geometrical parameters and the observed gas bubble and liquid slug lengths. According to the Pi-theorem, these lengths were affected by 6 dimensionless groups, namely (u(G,s) / u(L,s)), Re-L, We(L), (d(ln,Cl) / d(h)), (d(Ou,Cl) / d(h)), and Theta*. Based on more than 370 experimental data, novel correlations to predict gas bubble and liquid slug lengths were developed. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据