4.7 Article

Retinoids Regulate Adipogenesis Involving the TGFβ/SMAD and Wnt/β-Catenin Pathways in Human Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms18040842

关键词

human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell; adipogenesis; retinoid; retinoic acid receptor beta (RAR beta); TGF beta/SMAD pathway; Wnt/beta-catenin pathway

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81260283]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Retinoids may regulate cell differentiation as ligands of retinoic acid receptors (RARs) and/or retinoid X receptors (RXRs). We showed that RAR agonists promoted adipogenesis by upregulating the expression of CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein beta (C/EBP beta) in the early stages, but blocked adipogenesis at a later stage in human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (hBMSCs). RXR agonists promoted adipogenesis at all time points in hBMSCs. The effect of RAR agonists was mediated mainly by the RAR beta subtype. RAR agonists, in contrast to RXR agonists, significantly promoted the expression of RAR beta. Knockdown of the RAR beta gene via small hairpin RNA (shRNA) attenuated the inhibition of RAR agonists toward adipogenesis. Furthermore, we found that RAR agonists upregulated the transforming growth factor beta (TGF beta)/SMAD pathway and Wnt/beta-catenin pathway on adipogenesis in hBMSCs, and the stimulating effects were noticeably decreased with the RAR beta gene knockdown. Both RAR agonists and RXR agonists inhibited adipogenesis and blocked the promoter activity of C/EBP beta and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR gamma) in SW872 cell. These results indicated the RAR agonists perform dual roles in adipogenesis in hBMSCs, and the TGF beta /SMAD pathway and Wnt/beta-catenin pathway may involve the inhibitory effect of RAR agonists. RAR beta is the main receptor subtype mediating the effect. The roles of RXR agonists in adipogenesis exhibited cell type-specific differences, and may be based on the integration of signals from different RXR dimers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据