4.7 Article

Synthesis of NiS coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles as high-performance positive materials for alkaline nickel-iron rechargeable batteries

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 42, 期 39, 页码 24939-24947

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.08.045

关键词

Nickel-iron batteries; Pe(3)O(4) nanoparticles; Positive materials; NiS coating

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51672071, 21303042]
  2. National High Technology Research and Development Program [2013AA032002, 2015AA034601]
  3. Key Scientific Research Project of Henan Province [15A150056]
  4. Program for Innovative Research Team in University of Henan Province [17IRTSTHN001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, ethyl xanthate nickel (EXN) was used as nickel and sulfur sources to modify Fe3O4 powder nanoparticles dissolved in pyridine. After short heat treatments, the generated NiS nanoparticles were not only compactly and uniformly coated on the surface of Fe3O4 but also induced the decreased particle size of Fe3O4. The microstructure, morphology and particle size of the resulting NiS coated Fe3O4 particles were characterized X-ray diffraction (XRD), Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and Raman spectroscopy. The results showed that thickness of the NiS coating on Fe3O4 particles was about 6 nm. The NiS coated Fe3O4 particles were tested as positive materials for nickel-iron batteries and found to effectively inhibit the iron anode passivation and improve the efficiency of charge capacity. The NiS (1.5%) - Fe3O4 nano particles delivered a significant power density of 557.2 mA h g(-1) at a current density of 120 mA with a charging efficiency of 79.6%. Furthermore, discharge capacities of 550.2 and 436.8 mA h g(-1) were achieved respectively at 300 and 600 mA g(-1), with charging efficiencies reaching up 85.9% and 76.5% of the initial capacity after 100 cycles. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据