4.7 Review

Summary and evaluation on the heat transfer enhancement techniques of gas laminar and turbulent pipe flow

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.03.080

关键词

Turbulent; Heat transfer enhancement; Pipe flow; Performance evaluation

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFB0601204]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A systematic survey and evaluation on the thermal-hydraulic performance of gas inside internally finned, twisted tape or swirl generator inserted, corrugated, and dimpled, totally 436 pipes is conducted in this work. The gases in the investigations involve air, nitrogen, exhaust gases, and helium. Prandtl number is around 0.6-0.7. It is found that in the Reynolds number of 2 x 10(3) to 100 x 10(3), the ratios of Nusselt number over Dittus-Boelter equation for internal finned tubes are typically in the range of 1-6, tubes with twisted tape and other inserts are 1.5-6, corrugated tubes are 1-3 and dimpled tubes are 1-4, including compound enhancement techniques. The ratios of friction factor over Blasius equation is normally in the range of 1.5-14 for internally finned tubes, 2-200 for inserted twisted tapes and swirl generators, corrugated tubes is 1.5-10 and dimpled tubes is 1-8. The heat transfer enhancement ratios for gases are generally similar with liquid, while the friction factor increased ratios for gases are higher than that for liquids. The number of investigations on the tubes fitted with twisted tapes inserts, coil loops, and swirl generators are more than other three enhancement methods. The increment of pressure drop for twisted tape inserts are also the largest. By using performance evaluation plot, different enhancement techniques with the same reference are compared for their effectiveness. It indicates that the efficiency of pipes with different types of inserts for gases are mostly lower than internal finned, corrugated and dimpled tubes in this survey. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据