4.3 Article

Stability of lime essential oil emulsion prepared using biopolymers and ultrasound treatment

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD PROPERTIES
卷 20, 期 -, 页码 S564-S579

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10942912.2017.1303707

关键词

Emulsion conductivity; Emulsion kinetic stability; Gum arabic; Whey protein isolate; Zeta potential

资金

  1. FAPEMIG (Minas Gerais State Foundation for Research Development, Brazil) [CAG-PPM-00318-11]
  2. CNPq (National Council for Scientific and Technological Development, Brazil) [448530/2014-7]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of this study was to investigate the kinetic stability of lime essential oil emulsion using gum arabic (GA) and whey protein isolate (WPI) biopolymers as emulsifiers and stabilizers. Different solid compositions were evaluated: GA, GA/WPI (1:1) and WPI, as well as oil concentration (5.0, 7.5 and 10% w/w). Emulsions were prepared using an ultrasonic homogenizer. Viscosity, oil droplet size, zeta potential, pH and conductivity were measured to predict the emulsion stability over a period of 4 h (estimated time until complete drying in microencapsulation processes). Emulsion rheological behaviour and microstructure were characterized. All emulsions were stable during the time period analysed, and no destabilization characteristic was observed. The pH, conductivity and viscosity showed no significant difference (p>0.05) over the 4-h period. Emulsions with WPI showed higher zeta potential values, confirming the biopolymer electrosteric stabilization. The combination of wall materials (GA/WPI) and the oil concentration increased the average droplet size. The results of the apparent viscosity at shear rate of 100s(-1) confirmed the emulsions stability. These values did not change significantly considering the fresh emulsions and emulsions after 4h of preparation. The emulsifying biopolymers showed to be excellent natural stabilizers for lime essential oil emulsions, highlighting the results using WPI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据