4.6 Article

Tornado climatology of China

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY
卷 38, 期 5, 页码 2478-2489

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/joc.5369

关键词

tornado; climatology; design basis wind speed; China

资金

  1. National Energy Administration of China [NY 20110801-1]
  2. National Key Technology Research and Development Program [2014BAC06B02]
  3. Clean Air Research Project in China [201509001, 201409001]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41421064, 41575007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A tornado climatology in China was derived based on a recently completed data set with details on 4763 tornadoes in the period 1948-2012. The tornadoes were rated on the Fujita scale, and design basis tornado wind speeds were estimated. Annual tornadoes were estimated 108 (+/- 44) in China, among which 0-4 exceed F3 on the Fujita scale. Three strongest tornadoes in the data set were rated F4. Assessing from frequency distribution of ratings, tornadoes in China could be mostly of the non-supercell type. In average of all the country, most tornadoes occur in summer (June-August, about 64%). The peak month is July (31%). Geographically, the majority of tornadoes is distributed in eastern China, with the most frequent tornado occurrence being in the coastal provinces. There are southern type and northern type of tornado occurrence in eastern China. The former peaks in spring, while the latter peaks in summer. Two belts of design basis tornado wind speeds higher than 70ms(-1) were identified (on probability of 10(-7) per year). One extends approximately along the coastline of China from south to north, while the other crosses this belt from east to west, approximately upstream of the Yangtze River. The Yangtze River Delta and Pearl River Delta have design basis tornado wind speeds higher than 90 ms(-1), with maxima of 105 and 95 ms(-1), respectively. However, by transferring into the enhanced Fujita scale, the wind speed is much lower, with the corresponding maxima being 82 and 76 ms(-1) respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据