4.7 Article

Patient-derived xenografts of gastrointestinal cancers are susceptible to rapid and delayed B-lymphoproliferation

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 140, 期 6, 页码 1356-1363

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.30561

关键词

patient-derived xenograft; lymphoproliferation; colorectal cancer; pancreatic cancer

类别

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [KFO 227/GL286/1-1, KFO 227/BA 4806/1-2, SFB873]
  2. Baden-Wuerttemberg Stiftung gGmbH [P-LS-ASII/33]
  3. Helmholtz Association [iMed]
  4. EU Framework Programme Horizon2020 (TRANSCAN-2 ERA-NET) [TACTIC]
  5. German Cancer Aid [Colon-Resist-Net (SP2, SP4)]
  6. DKFZ-Heidelberg Center for Personalized Oncology (DKFZ-HIPO) [HIPO-002, HIPO-012]
  7. National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) [NCT3.0_2015.4 TransOnco, NCT3.0_2015.52 DysregPT]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Patient-derived cancer xenografts (PDX) are widely used to identify and evaluate novel therapeutic targets, and to test therapeutic approaches in preclinical mouse avatar trials. Despite their widespread use, potential caveats of PDX models remain considerably underappreciated. Here, we demonstrate that EBV-associated B-lymphoproliferations frequently develop following xenotransplantation of human colorectal and pancreatic carcinomas in highly immunodeficient NOD. Cg-Prkdc(scid) Il2rg(tm1Wjl) /SzJ (NSG) mice (18/47 and 4/37 mice, respectively), and in derived cell cultures in vitro. Strikingly, even PDX with carcinoma histology can host scarce EBV-infected B-lymphocytes that can fully overgrow carcinoma cells during serial passaging in vitro and in vivo. As serial xenografting is crucial to expand primary tumor tissue for biobanks and cohorts for preclinical mouse avatar trials, the emerging dominance of B-lymphoproliferations in serial PDX represents a serious confounding factor in these models. Consequently, repeated phenotypic assessments of serial PDX are mandatory at each expansion step to verify bona fide carcinoma xenografts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据