4.6 Article

A spatial analysis of dietary patterns in a large representative population in the north of The Netherlands - the Lifelines cohort study

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12966-017-0622-8

关键词

Dietary patterns; Spatial analysis; Environment; Food cultures

资金

  1. De Fryslan Zorgverzekeraar

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Diet is an important modifiable risk factor for chronic diseases. In the search for effective strategies to improve dietary patterns in order to promote healthy ageing, new approaches considering contextual factors in public health medicine are warranted. The aim of this study is to examine the spatial clustering of dietary patterns in a large representative sample of adults. Methods: Dietary patterns were defined on the basis of a 111 item Food Frequency Questionnaire among n = 117,570 adults using principal components analysis. We quantified the spatial clustering of dietary pattern scores at the neighborhood level using the Global Moran's I spatial statistic, taking into consideration individual demographic and (neighborhood) socioeconomic indicators. Results: Four dietary patterns explaining 27% of the variance in dietary data were extracted in this population and named the bread and cookies pattern, the snack pattern, the meat and alcohol pattern and the vegetable, fruit and fish pattern. Significant spatial clustering of high (hot spot) and low (cold spot) dietary pattern scores was found for all four dietary patterns irrespective of age and gender differences. Educational attainment and neighborhood income explained the global clustering to some extent, although clustering at smaller regional scales persisted. Conclusion: The significant region-specific hot and cold spots of the four dietary patterns illustrate the existence of regional food cultures and underscore the need for interventions targeted at the sub-national level in order to tackle unhealthy dietary behavior and to stimulate people to make healthy dietary choices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据