4.5 Article

Attribute reduction for sequential three-way decisions under dynamic granulation

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijar.2017.03.009

关键词

Rough set; Attribute reduction; Sequential three-way decisions; Decision-theoretic rough set models; Dynamic granulation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61672270, 61602216, 61403329, 61573235]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20141152]
  3. Humanity and Social Science Youth Foundation of Ministry of Education of China [15YJCZH129]
  4. National Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2013FQ020]
  5. Qing Lan Project of Jiangsu Province of China
  6. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Big Data Analysis Technology/B-DAT (Nanjing University of Information Science Technology) [KXK1402]
  7. Key Laboratory of Cloud Computing and Intelligent Information Processing of Changzhou City [CM20123004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In real-world decision making, sequential three-way decisions are an effective way of human problem solving under multiple levels of granularity. Making the right decision at the most optimal level is a crucial issue. To this end, we address the attribute reduction problem for sequential three-way decisions under dynamic granulation. By reviewing the existing definitions of attribute reducts, a new attribute reduct for sequential three-way decisions is defined, and a corresponding monotonic attribute significance measure is designed. An attribute reduction algorithm satisfying the monotonicity of the probabilistic positive region is developed. The relationships of the different attribute reducts, the probabilistic positive regions and the probabilistic positive rules for decision-theoretic rough set models are further discussed under global view, local view and sequential three-way decisions. Experimental results demonstrate that our method is effective. This study will provide a new insight into the attribute reduction problem of sequential three-way decisions. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据