4.3 Article

The not so innocent heart murmur: a 5-year experience

期刊

INTERNAL MEDICINE JOURNAL
卷 47, 期 2, 页码 199-205

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/imj.13331

关键词

heart murmur clinic; echocardiography

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Auckland City Hospital (ACH) established a Heart Murmur Clinic (HMC) with the aim of providing prompt assessment of patients with asymptomatic systolic murmurs. This may lead to early intervention and improved outcomes if significant structural heart disease is detected and reassurance if no significant findings are found. Similar clinics for children have proven beneficial; the benefit of a HMC in an adult population has been difficult to determine. Aim: To review the clinical demographics and echocardiographic information of patients presenting to our HMC, to assess what proportion of significance structural heart disease had and determine the common structural abnormalities in this population. Methods: This is a retrospective review of patients aged >= 15 years presenting to our HMC between March 2010 and December 2015 with an asymptomatic systolic murmur. Patients with previous cardiac surgery or known congenital or valvular heart disease were excluded. Results: A total of 1221 patients was reviewed over the 5-year period; 980 underwent echocardiography. Significant cardiac disease was detected in 156 patients, with 23 patients requiring surgical intervention over the 5-year period. Significant aortic stenosis (n = 43) and mitral regurgitation (n = 48) were the most common pathologies. Patients > 65 years were more likely to have structural heart disease (16% vs 11%, P < 0.05). Conclusion: Establishing a HMC has allowed the screening of a large number of patients who would otherwise have low priority for assessment. We have identified a large proportion with significant structural disease, which has allowed for early surgical intervention when appropriate and may potentially result in improved patient outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据